PUBLISHED FACTS // forgejo vs docmost
Forgejo vs Docmost
| FACT | Forgejo | Docmost |
|---|---|---|
| SUMMARY | Community-governed software forge | Collaborative knowledge system |
| VERIFICATION | ● HUMAN REVIEWED | ▲ STALE |
| LICENSE | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| PRIMARY DEPLOYMENT | COMPOSE | COMPOSE |
| LINUX SUPPORT | supported | supported |
| ARCHITECTURES | amd64 · arm64 | amd64 · arm64 |
| RESOURCE NOTES | A small team can start with modest CPU and memory; repository storage grows with projects and Actions workloads. | Budget for application memory, PostgreSQL, Redis, uploaded assets, and collaboration growth. |
| DEPENDENCIES | Docker Compose, persistent repository storage, and a supported database for production use. | Docker Compose with PostgreSQL, Redis, and persistent application storage. |
| AUTHENTICATION | Local accounts plus OAuth2/OIDC and LDAP integration options. | Built-in users with documented authentication and workspace controls. |
| BACKUP NOTES | Back up the database, repository data, configuration, and SSH keys as one recoverable set. | Back up PostgreSQL plus uploaded assets and application configuration. |
| TRADE-OFFS | It has a smaller integration ecosystem than GitHub; advanced enterprise governance may need companion tooling. | Requires a multi-service stack; validate the current upstream release and maintenance state before adoption. |